Re: Bug#568017: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for openoffice.org debconf (fwd)
indeed. and this was my response. the second one I have ignored
completely.
--
/brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
Bruce Schneier once killed a man using only linear cryptanalysis.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:46:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Martin Bagge <brother@bsnet.se>
To: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Cc: Martin Bagge <brother@bsnet.se>, 568017-done@bugs.debian.org,
control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#568017: [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for openoffice.org debconf
tags 568017 wontfix
thanks
Your reaction is totally inapprproate. Did I flame you? No.
I really don't care and I really see no need for you to point it out when I
already had failed to please your inner wishes.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:04:03AM +0100, Martin Bagge wrote:
If I was stepping on the delicate toes of His Highness then please do not
use my translation at all.
It was already set to pending in the reply. So where do I say I don't want
to use it? What I *do* care about is the sanity of the openoffice.org
_I_ do not want you to use it. I never said you didn't.
bug list, thogh, if I didn't we would have 1000 bugs or so like Ubuntu
has where many of them do not apply and/or where fixed ages ago.
I don't see that as a problem, you do and for the next time be more precise. I
will at least try to be more thoughtful if I ever do anything for
openoffice.org in Debian.
Two days time frame and I miss one line in a more or less standardized
Three. The 3 was a typo.
And how would I know that? It's still short and we do have to prioritize among
what strings to do. I see openoffice.org as a really important package that
needs to be completed as fast as possible.
--
/brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
Bruce Schneier knows your private key.
Reply to: