Quoting Christian Holm Christensen (cholm@nbi.dk): > Hi, > > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 06:34 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > The package maintainer agreed for the NMU or did not respond in two > > > weeks, so I will proceed with the NMU. > > > > > > ...or not..:-) > > > > root-system FTBFS (#529998) > > The patch attached to the bug report does indeed fix the problem. > > My main problem right now, is that I'm on vacation for the next month > and even thought I do have a network connection - I'll be in no position > to work on the packages. > > > and I don't have the skills to fix > > this. So, unless the maitnainer fixes the FTBFS *and* updates l10n, > > there is no chance that the package gets its l10n bugs fixed soon. > > I suggest that you just apply the posted fix and use that as part of > your NMU release. I see no harm in that. OK, no problem. I actually didn't notice the patch. Of course, I'll be happy to do the NMU with the patch as, in addition to fix l10n issues, that will fix an RC bug as well..:-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature