Hello,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:03:59PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> My proposal would be to drop the lists http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/
> and add a list with the PO files of native packages (+ packages whose L10N
> is know to be managed by Debian).
Maybe this list could be split, first the native (+ l10n managed by
Debian) packages, and than behind a link the "other".
> Alternatively, we could add a preeminent warning on the top of
> http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/ that these translations should be
> coordinated with the corresponding upstreams (IMHO, it is also the case
> for PO files which are used in Debian).
I would strongly support that. I've seen translators rather
disappointed that their hard work was not accepted but rather they
were requested to go to a different place to try to get their work
included.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature