Hello, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:03:59PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote: > My proposal would be to drop the lists http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/ > and add a list with the PO files of native packages (+ packages whose L10N > is know to be managed by Debian). Maybe this list could be split, first the native (+ l10n managed by Debian) packages, and than behind a link the "other". > Alternatively, we could add a preeminent warning on the top of > http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/ that these translations should be > coordinated with the corresponding upstreams (IMHO, it is also the case > for PO files which are used in Debian). I would strongly support that. I've seen translators rather disappointed that their hard work was not accepted but rather they were requested to go to a different place to try to get their work included. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature