[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU bacula to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting John Goerzen (jgoerzen@complete.org):
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:40:15PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Blah blah...
> > 
> > John, I actually intended to send the "soft" version of my "Intent to
> > NMU" text, which is less "rude" to maintainers. 
> 
> No problem ;-)
> 
> I do intend to upload myself, and have an upload now.  But I'm unclear
> how this will reach testing, given that a freeze is in place already?
> 
> Do I just upload to unstable, urgency=low, like usual?

Yes. I was away for 2 days and haven't checked, yet, if you already
uploaded.

If you haven't, we could maybe run a small call for translations and
then you would upload with (maybe) some more debconf translations.

To reach testing, the upload has of course to meet the release
criteria. l10n updates are OK, upstream version bumps have to be
discussed with the RM, and packaging changes should be motivated in
some way....but you probably know the drill.



-- 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: