Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:13:21PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> Would you still accept an ABI change of apt to support description
>> translations into etch?
>
> I gather that "ABI change" means an soname change? In that case, no, sorry,
> I think it's too late in the release cycle to be changing this for apt.
Hello Steve,
I would like to ask you to review again your position. This code is
around since 3 years ago and in use on Ubuntu too. Are too few
packages that will need recompile.
There's no API changes from APT side so just binary NMUs are enough
AFAIK.
TIA,
- --
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
- ---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
- ---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFFG18ULqiZQEml+FURAqkhAJ9fxAaJzegtbuW3CsD2NlQHxyTm/gCfeAbr
TSNRt6VMjtlHCztH4b+qpN0=
=r+86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: