[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [D-I] D-I Packages maintainers: New (improved?) way to add packages to the localization framework



I already posted some comments on the list proposed by Christian on 
#d-boot, but probably just posting a counter-proposal to the list makes 
more sense.

I feel this order keeps related things together a bit better; I've also 
moved some "expert mode" udebs a bit down in the order.
I've added some comments to explain the order; these could be deleted.

# General d-i stuff
main-menu
debian-installer-utils
anna

# First half of 1st stage
localechooser
kbd-chooser
cdrom-detect
hw-detect
netcfg
choose-mirror
retriever/net
retriever/cdrom
retriever/floppy
mountfloppy

# Generic and i386 partman
partman/partman-base
partman/partman-auto
partman/partman-basicmethods
partman/partman-partitioning
partman/partman-basicfilesystems
partman/partman-ext3
partman/partman-reiserfs
partman/partman-jfs
partman/partman-xfs
partman/partman-ext2r0
partman/partman-target

# Second half of 1st stage
tzsetup
clock-setup
base-installer
cdebconf
prebaseconfig
nobootloader

# i386 bootloader
arch/i386/grub-installer
arch/i386/lilo-installer

# powerpc partman and bootloader
partman/partman-newworld
partman/partman-prep
arch/powerpc/quik-installer
arch/powerpc/yaboot-installer

# Optional components
preseed
rescue
iso-scan
installation-report
cdrom-checker
network-console

# Other architectures partman and bootloader
partman/partman-palo
partman/partman-efi
arch/ia64/elilo-installer
arch/alpha/aboot-installer
arch/m68k/vmelilo-installer
arch/sparc/silo-installer
arch/mips/arcboot-installer
arch/mips/sibyl-installer
arch/mipsel/colo-installer
arch/mipsel/delo-installer

# Expert components
mdcfg
lvmcfg
partman/partman-md
partman/partman-lvm
partman/partman-auto-lvm
partman/partman-crypto

# Rest
partconf
partitioner
autopartkit
arch/s390/netdevice
arch/s390/dasd
arch/s390/zipl-installer
baseconfig-udeb

Attachment: pgprLqIsm0wsU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: