Re: Intention to NMU freeswan for l10n issues
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
| Dear Luk,
Hi Rene
| On Monday 07 February 2005 16:38, you wrote:
|
|>The freeswan Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has at
|>least one very longstanding (over 100 days) localisation bug
|>report. Often, but not always, this means that the package is not very
|>actively maintained. I'm sending you this mail for checking the
|>situation and to decide the next necessary steps. If there is some
|>reason why you haven't fixed the bug yet, or there is something other
|>you might want to tell me, i will be very happy about any feedback. In
|>this case please accept my apologies.
|
| There is a reason why I did not change freeswan other than for
| security-critical bugs during the last 6 months - it is dead... It is no
| longer maintained upstream and has been superseded by openswan. In
fact, I am
| currently preparing a transition package that installs openswan. The
freeswan
| package will be removed from the archive when all users have finished the
| transition (which might take some while, but the transition package
should
| not need to be changed).
Ok, I won't NMU. Sorry for the trouble. Please be so kind to incorporate
the translations in openswan. I can send you a patch if you like?
Cheers
Luk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCB6BM5UTeB5t8Mo0RAn5BAJ4n4EaOsXAxIyxSwKq/iyKWCLwZmQCeJQz3
ucCkC4OM0NGHysA4TidiBqc=
=leQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: