Re: Euro key

[Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă <tgakic@sg10.chem.tue.nl>]

În data de 14/09/2001, 08:48:36, David Starner a scris:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:41:36AM +0200, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> > ISO-8859-16. Latin9 replace Latin1 and Latin10 (ISO-8859-16) replace
> > Latin2.
> 
> Unlike Latin 9, Latin 10 doesn't cover all the languages of its 
> predecessor - Czech, for example, isn't covered by Latin 10. So
> it's not a full replacement.
> 

Latin 10 doesn't cover all the languages of its predecessor,
you are right. But it is the only one covering Romanian
language. Latin2 was not good for Romanian.

Ionel