Re: creating Hurd chroots on Linux using DPKG_ROOT chrootless mode
- To: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: creating Hurd chroots on Linux using DPKG_ROOT chrootless mode
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 20:01:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20240520180100.xqvwxyprtm3yzv2m@begin>
- Mail-followup-to: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <171274413323.1830534.1260968707891976220@localhost>
- References: <170029920261.222037.689099076428529072.reportbug@localhost> <170030184608.590598.2640218128308018743@localhost> <170037631674.590598.17035070618464523647@localhost> <170492832921.2314726.13178562127635179548@localhost> <170732564124.3498056.9774055924478078737@localhost> <171273654288.1475367.4260951650396250932@localhost> <20240410084614.y7pionkwd3l5e4sz@begin> <171274413323.1830534.1260968707891976220@localhost>
Hello,
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, le mer. 10 avril 2024 12:15:33 +0200, a ecrit:
> It seems that new versions of login, passwd and util-linux require a more
> recent version of pam than was last buildable:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> login : PreDepends: libpam-runtime but it is not going to be installed
> PreDepends: libpam-modules but it is not installable
> passwd : Depends: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) but it is not installable
> Depends: libpam-modules but it is not installable
> util-linux : PreDepends: libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
The available version (1.5.3-6+hurd.1) is largely enough for 0.99.7.1, I
don't think it's a question of "newer login, passwd and util-linux".
Note the subtle difference between "is not going to be installed" and
"is not installable". The latter means there is no available version at
all, while libpam-modules=1.5.3-6+hurd.1 is installable, from
deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/ unreleased main
Samuel
Reply to: