[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1059986: dpkg: Please add hurd-arm64 case



Package: dpkg
Version: 1.22.2
Severity: normal
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd

Hello,

aarch64-gnu support is coming too :)

Could you add a hurd-amd64 case in dpkg?

Thanks,
Samuel

-- Package-specific info:
This system uses merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs, going behind dpkg's
back, breaking its core assumptions. This can cause silent file
overwrites and disappearances, and its general tools misbehavior.
See <https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/FAQ#broken-usrmerge>.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64

Kernel: Linux 6.6.0 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.8-5+b1
ii  libc6        2.37-13
ii  liblzma5     5.4.5-0.1
ii  libmd0       1.1.0-1
ii  libselinux1  3.5-1+b1
ii  libzstd1     1.5.5+dfsg2-2
ii  tar          1.34+dfsg-1.3
ii  zlib1g       1:1.3.dfsg-3

dpkg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages dpkg suggests:
ii  apt            2.7.6
pn  debsig-verify  <none>

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/logrotate.d/dpkg changed [not included]

-- no debconf information

-- 
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.


Reply to: