[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1005959: marked as done (mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2022 00:58:15 +0100
with message-id <20220301235815.oak6s4ln7fwcmn7h@begin>
and subject line Re: Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005959,
regarding mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

1005959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mig-for-host
Version: 1.8+git20200618-9
User: helmutg@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap

Hi Samuel,

I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and
mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about
mig:amd64. Are you sure that these are correct? I think none of them
should exist, because they all imply Linux rather than Mach. Can you
shed some light as to why they should exist? If not, please remove them.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.8+git20200618-10

Samuel Thibault, le dim. 20 févr. 2022 19:57:58 +0100, a ecrit:
> Helmut Grohne, le dim. 20 févr. 2022 07:50:59 +0100, a ecrit:
> > If you agree with this change in principle, I can look into writing a
> > patch for it.
> If you're interesting in having a look you're welcome, otherwise I
> believe I see how to change things.

I believe this is fixed in version 1.8+git20200618-10.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: