Dear ports maintainer, The ftpmaster team would like to clarify which Debian ports should and/or would like to continue to be part of Debian unstable and experimental. As outlined on the Debian Archive Criteria page[0], the key points to consider are whether the architecture has been part of a stable release, whether it is *likely* to be part of a stable release, as well as whether it currently has a sensible number of active maintainers. Whilst you may be happy to continue the work of maintaining the port regardless, don't forget that excess or otherwise unnecessary architectures involve a shared maintenance burden as well as incurring non-trivial requirements on mirror/Debian resources. The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion. So, in the first instance, would you like to continue being part of unstable/experimental? [0]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/archive-criteria.html [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ Cheers, Luke Faraone
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature