Re: (Why don't try to port GNU/Hurd, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040/68060?)

To: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: (Why don't try to port GNU/Hurd, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040/68060?)
From: pdb <id3rfix@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:20:08 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAM_1OU62xoRkUqWsPzVEGBAnzMWB8aihDPTvbqy7s6RKkGeOPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAM_1OU6NX8s+9DqvzzsWb=z9nkfXQnfv18TCLNr8WqwVx_MJSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM_1OU6NX8s+9DqvzzsWb=z9nkfXQnfv18TCLNr8WqwVx_MJSQ@mail.gmail.com>

Why don't try to port of: GNU/HURD, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040 or 68060? (Paolo Del Bene)

Have you ever thinked to port GNU/HURD and/or GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with cpu 68040/68060?

Awaiting for your reply as soon as possible,

Greetings,

Paolo Del Bene iw0fzw

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (Why don't try to port GNU/Hurd, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040/68060?)
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#886379: imx-usb-loader: FTBFS on hurd-i386: PATH_MAX undeclared
Next by Date: Re: (Why don't try to port GNU/Hurd, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040/68060?)
Previous by thread: Bug#886379: imx-usb-loader: FTBFS on hurd-i386: PATH_MAX undeclared
Next by thread: Re: (Why don't try to port GNU/Hurd, GNU/KFreeBSD on QL Sinclair with 68040/68060?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread