Re: isc-dhcpd vs udhcpd
On 23 Oct 2017, at 08:36, Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while revising bind9 udebs, KiBi suggested that non-Linux architectures
> might be using isc-dhcpd instead of udhcpd due some problems and it
> might be a good idea to revise the decision now that we have a busybox
> maintainer?
That's not going to work right now for two reasons:
1. Busybox still FTBFS on these (I have a patch series submitted upstream that
needs minor revisions, so this should resolve itself soon).
2. udhcp's Config.src has "select PLATFORM_LINUX", so building udhcp{c,d}
isn't even attempted (it includes linux/filter.h and linux/if_packet.h).
I'm sure it could be ported, but someone would need to do that work.
Regards,
James
Reply to: