On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > From the report, you can see the CPU being almost 100% User > Consumed. > > By ext2fs and dpkg, that's not surprising. I'm just surprised that it > takes long. Also, procfs is involved, how frequent do you make top > refresh its output? The way it gets information from procfs may not > be > so efficient. What do you think about the memory consumption ? It is low, around 35%. I think this is turning out to be a /usr/bin/kvm vs libvirt issue. But I need to nail that first, to make that statement. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part