Re: Plan B for kfreebsd
Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +0000, a écrit :
> > > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no
> > > security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are
> > > therefore none of their machines DSA?
> >
> > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not
> > released arch" loop.
>
> Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated time and time again that
> if an arch qualifies for a release in all other aspects, we'd be running
> buildds and porterboxes close to the release. And, TTBOMK, the release
> team has so far accepted that. IOW the fact that hurd is not being
> released with jessie is not due to not having d.o systems.
Ok, then I don't understand why there are "DSA-admined buildds" and
"security buildds" columns in the release qualification sheet.
Samuel
Reply to: