Re: stats

[Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:50:57PM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> > Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 07 Jul 2014 17:04:49 +0200, a écrit :
> >> How about scheduling it on Debian infrastructure? Just not to depend
> >> on a laptop.
> >
> > Because I have to connect to various servers to collect the
> > informations, and I can't afford letting some servers be allowed to
> > connect to some other servers.
> >
> > Anyway, is this really a problem?  This is just temporary, and I don't
> > really want to spend some time on finding a way to do it differently,
> > while it may not actually pose problem.
> >
> > Which files are really wanted so badly as to be available every day?
> > As I said, summary and out_of_date are fine to update even on crappy
> > networks, it's rather things like the graph which is not.
> 
> Personally I'm just interested in summary.txt to get percentages and
> out_of_date.txt to compare to old one to get what changed (hint).

About the latter, I agree it is a useful thing to have.

But I think the right approach would be to hack buildd.debian.org to
provide an RSS feed with the new failed package per architecture.


Michael