Re: [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate

To: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Cc: 4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de
Subject: Re: [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate
From: Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:14:44 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 52EA6C64.6000200@pyro.eu.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140128112222.15106.26246@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
References: <[🔎] 20140128112222.15106.26246@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>

Hi,

Since you didn't mention Upstart in this draft, may I ask your point of
view on it?  Is there any prospect/interest in using it on GNU/Hurd?

What if it becomes the default, or the second-most popular init system
in Debian?  Or if it is used by GNU/kFreeBSD for jessie?

The main benefit I see could be already-written job files, coming from
Debian or Ubuntu, particularly if the package maintainer stops
maintaining the sysvinit scripts.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate
  - From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>

References:
- [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate
  - From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: installing a DM in the qemu image?
Next by Date: installing a DM in the qemu image?
Previous by thread: [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate
Next by thread: Re: [draft] Debian/Hurd porters position in the default init system debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread