Re: Checks for getcwd(NULL, 0) and get_current_dir_name()
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 10:21:03 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Not that it matters for choosing a feature macro name. The best
> names for such things are purely descriptive rather than referring
> to a system by name anyway. i.e., HAVE_GETCWD_NULL_MALLOCS or
> suchlike.
Ah, even better, true.
thanks,
guillem
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Check for getcwd(NULL, 0) Was: Re: Bug#636568: xerces-c: Updated patch, submitted upstream
- From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Checks for getcwd(NULL, 0) and get_current_dir_name()
- From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Checks for getcwd(NULL, 0) and get_current_dir_name()
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Re: Checks for getcwd(NULL, 0) and get_current_dir_name()
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>