Re: Re: Architecture qualification
On 6/1/12, Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> > On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> > > [...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with
>> > > break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs
>> > > for hurd-i386 are not RC.
>> >
>> > Maybe that's all that's needed?
>> >
>> > The recent enthusiasm sounds to me like an opportunity. An official
>> > testing suite in the archive, from which usable installer images can be
>> > built, could be what encourages hurd-i386 to progress into something
>> > really releasable. If this doesn't happen now while there's some
>> > momentum, it might never happen again and that would be a shame.
>>
>> >From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution
>> indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of
>> users and contributors will increase (hopefully). Can it be part of
>> testing and then when the release happens, be treated specially?
>
> As I understand it, this has been discussed but deemed not
> possible/worthwhile.
>
>> And most packages will be located in the main repo, only the packages
>> having patches, not yet handled by the DMs, being there. Is that
>> possible?
>
> What do you mean with "there"? Either there is a testing distribution,
> or there is not, as far as Debian is concerned.
>
>
> Michael
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> [🔎] 20120601235418.GR10082@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120601235418.GR10082@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
>
>
Reply to: