Re: hurd-i386 qualification for Wheezy
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 30 May 2012 11:31:24 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 30 May 2012 11:14:24 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > * its archive coverage is far lower than required
> > > >
> > > > What is required, currently the percentage is 77%.
> > >
> > > No, it is rather 76%.
> > It would be interesting to know how large the percentage would be if all
> > the pending bugs were attended (and including mono, that one is in the
> > works). Is it possible to derive an estimate?
> Since there are about 10000 source packages, it's almost exactly 0.01%
> per fixed package (plus reverse dependencies).
The tricky part are the reverse dependencies, e.g. how many more
packages will build when the psmisc bug, #673485, is closed? Can this be
derived with the aid of