Re: e2fsprogs patch for review (and other stuff)
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 11:44 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Thu 06 Oct 2011 11:42:05 +0200, a écrit :
> > Arne Babenhauserheide, le Thu 06 Oct 2011 08:11:08 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011, 17:53:49 schrieb Svante Signell:
> > > > Even if Samuel creates the build summaries like summary.txt and
> > > > graph-total-top.txt there is no priority list on which packages are most
> > > > important to concentrate on. Such a list would be very useful for people
> > > > working with package porting.
> > >
> > > I also think that would be very useful.
> >
> > Sure, but someone has to do it. In the meanwhile, the automatic lists
> > graph-total-top.txt and out-of-date.txt are the best we can do.
>
> Also, remember that there is a list on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd
Yes, there is a list there and a partial list at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/contributing.html
In addition to that it would be nice to have a short term list,
like: coreutils, binutils, e2fsprogs, etc. that are not the latest
versions.
Is there some easy way to generate a list of packages sorted in
Priority: required, essential, important, optional, etc that currently
does not build.
Reply to: