[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#639517: Riddling absence of /usr/lib/libattr.la

On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
>> This idea must come from libacl-dev.
>> And really in
>>   /lib/libacl.la
>> i read
>>   dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
> Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
> libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build
> of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512).
> libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched
> the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing).

A porter binNMU of the old days ;-)



Reply to: