[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#386774: marked as done (hurd: hurd_20060825-2 ruins /servers/socket/2)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:30:32 +0100
with message-id <20110225023032.GA1221@const.famille.thibault.fr>
and subject line Re: hurd_20060825-2 ruins /servers/socket/2
has caused the Debian Bug report #386774,
regarding hurd: hurd_20060825-2 ruins /servers/socket/2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
386774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Severity: normal
Package: hurd
Version: 20060825-2

After upgrading hurd from 20050513-4 to 20060825-2, /servers/socket/2
is now messed up.

Before upgrade:

ls -l /servers/socket

total 8
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 0, 0 Dec 21  2005 1
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 0, 0 Sep 10 02:46 2
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1 Dec 21  2005 inet -> 2
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1 Dec 21  2005 local -> 1

After upgrade:

ls -l /servers/socket

total 4
?--------- ? ?    ?       ?            ? /servers/socket/2
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 0, 0 Dec 21  2005 1
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1 Dec 21  2005 inet -> 2
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root    1 Dec 21  2005 local -> 1

This installation is on qemu-0.8.2.  Before the upgrade, networking
worked; after it doesn't, with the message of a dying translator.

I have tried various settrans commands to bring back socket 2, but to
no avail.

Merely *unpacking* version 20050513-4 fixes the socket, at which point
networking works again.

Thanks!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
The actual problem has been solved already.

Samuel

--- End Message ---
Reply to: