- To: Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org>, debian-hurd <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: pthread_atfork()
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:25:01 -0800
- Message-id: <1198805101.19780.21.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <20071228011449.GE4314@implementation>
- References: <20071222013540.GA4695@implementation> <1198289412.8917.6.camel@localhost> <20071223205303.GE5098@implementation> <1198529117.4724.44.camel@localhost> <20071228011449.GE4314@implementation>
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 01:14 +0000, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Mon 24 Dec 2007 15:45:17 -0500, a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 21:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Fri 21 Dec 2007 21:10:12 -0500, a écrit :
> > > > We are supposed to gave libc #defines that say that a function is a stub
> > > > when it just returns ENOSYS, which configure checks for. Or something
> > > > like that.
> > >
> > > You mean the configure of those programs that try to use
> > > pthread_atfork()?
> > Yes. This is how it works for other functions in general.
> Ah, you mean in <gnu/stubs.h> I guess? However, that's a GNU extension,
> which pike7.6 will most probably not want to depend on.
It's using *configure*. That's a GNU thing already. If it's using
configure, and not wanting to do gnu things, then there is no reason to
fret about them further.
Are you aware that every autoconf-using program *already* does this,