On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:44:44AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Andrew Sackville-West, le Wed 25 Jul 2007 15:39:30 -0700, a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:24:42PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 10:35:33PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > > > > > Debian will continue the Hurd/Mach port until a viable alternative > > > > exists, which will likely take a few years, if there will ever be one. > > > > hmmm... so how much of the Hurd/Mach port work comes from upstream and > > how much from debian? Is this an effort that has mostly been relegated > > to debian or does it continue upstream? > > It's not a really a question of which entity does the work. People do > the work, and it happens that while people dare to include experimental > stuff to debian for broad testing, they don't dare to commit into > upstream. okay, thanks to both you and Michael for your response. I understand. And I wasn't trying to imply that one group was doing more or less than another or anything of that sort... I'm just trying to suss out what's going on... I'm gonna go lurk for a while while I try to get this thing going. thanks A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature