Hello! On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:07:24PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/06/07 at 13:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, DDPOMail robot wrote: > > > gnumach: > > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > > to testing for more than 751 days. > > > > > > hurd: > > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > > to testing for more than 751 days. > > > > > > mig: > > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > > to testing for more than 751 days. > It seemed easier to just ignore those 3 packages, so I just did that. For the `hurd' package this is correct. But didn't we agree (some few weeks ago) that the `gnumach' and `mig' packages indeed should migrate to testing, as they're also useful on non-Hurd systems? Regards, Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature