Bug#162663: This is the only thing keeping gnumach-dev from testing

["Regis Boudin" <regis@boudin.name>]

On Wed, May 30, 2007 14:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
>> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
>> explain why it should still be open.
>
> Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still holds?

And I'd point that libc6-dev depends on linux-libc-dev (formerly
linux-kernel-headers) which is priority optional, and looks like exactly
the same situation. I'm wondering if this point of the policy should be
ignored for the specific case of libc-dev depending on the kernel headers,
whatever the kernel is (so the same would apply for kfreebsd).

Regis