Re: Linux-specific ACL stuff in coreutils

[Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:46:48AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> 
> To clarify, I don't care. If hurd can't do acl's then there's probably
> not much point in porting libacl. If it can do acl's and somebody wants
> to make them work, fine. If you want to send some other patch to fix a
> build problem, that's fine too.

Thanks for clarifiing. I'll see what can be done for this.

-- 
Robert Millan

"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."

 -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)