Re: Hurd Advocacy?

To: "deFreese, Barry" <Barry.deFreese@nike.com>
Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hurd Advocacy?
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:14:03 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030818171403.GI1071@212.23.136.22>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2D14766B2568D611A80B0008C733F3DD032B409F@foothill-svr-03.nike.com>
References: <[🔎] 2D14766B2568D611A80B0008C733F3DD032B409F@foothill-svr-03.nike.com>

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:01:40AM -0700, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> Speaking of SMP.  If (when?) we shoot for SMP support would we shoot for
> processor affinity or leave it up to the scheduler like in Linux?

Rapidly getting off topic, but as a general rule of thumb we want all the
great features that you'd expect from a modern OS.

Thanks,
Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU      http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann              The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/

Reply to:

References:
- RE: Hurd Advocacy?
  - From: "deFreese, Barry" <Barry.deFreese@nike.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Hurd Advocacy?
Next by Date: Re: Hurd Advocacy?
Previous by thread: RE: Hurd Advocacy?
Next by thread: Re: Hurd advocacy?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread