Re: why was um-pppd removed?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:27:42PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Great. Last time I checked, it was around ~4800 bps, which is just a
> wee-bit better than not working at all.
Far from that. It means that the package works fine, and only the serial
driver needs fixing.
> In this case, you'll just have to reintroduce um-pppd and have fun.
If that would be easier for Debian, I would agree. However, removing and
adding packages are expensive for Debian, as they require manual work.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
Reply to: