Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:45:30PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:33:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > fine! i still like having a separate list of api-porting-related bugs in
> > debian BTS, but as Marcus said Savannah is the canonical place.
> I hope you aer talking about bugs in the Hurd and GNU Mach (and MiG, and
> whatever other components we come up with).
I'm mostly talking about the Hurd (for the libraries) and Glibc
> This depends. If it is a genuine bug in the latest CVS (and are prepared to
> deal with any responses from the hackers), you can try libc-alpha. Otherwise
> you should use the Debian BTS.
Using the Debian BTS seems the simplest option as of now. what do the Gentoo
people think about it?
> tags for bug reports will be created when I (or some other hacker) feel the
> need for it. How and which tags are created follows an undocumented pattern
> that only exists in my head (and even there only vaguely).
I just meant putting an agreed string in the bug description heard, like
"[porting]" or the like.
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide