[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ssh, /dev/urandom



neal@cs.uml.edu (Neal H. Walfield) writes:

> > If our only alternatives are
> > 
> > 1) no ssh
> > 2) ssh with no security
> 
> Wrong, which just proves that you have not read this thread: we are
> arguing about entropy; ssh is only a side argument.

*IF*.  Can you read the word *IF*?

The proposition was advanced that no security is better than bad
security.  I disagree with *that* proposition, specifically.



Reply to: