Re: hurd patch
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:26:45AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> 2) This patch is probably wrong in the sense that there's no good reason
> for us to call autoconf.
Well, we don't keep the generated files in CVS. So what I could do is run
autoconf manually when doing the package, but that is just one more manual
step I need to explain or document to future packages and that can go wrong.
It's a side effect of tracking CVS I guess.
> I also have a slight bias in that I sent in a patch for autoconf 2.5x
> support recently and I would rather see that applied. =)
Definitely ;) If we do another upload before that, we can fix that build
depends bug. Otherwise we will get it fixed by applying your patch.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
Reply to: