Re: Which packages should I use?
My long running theory about this is that people crave a shorter
colloquial(sp?) term for talking about both linux and hurd. If I were
talking about them in the official sense I would try to use GNU/Hurd, or
GNU/Linux, but in conversations it seems awkward. And how many non-GNU
versions of linux and hurd are there? Sometimes it seems redundant to
qualify linux and hurd with GNU....
Not meant to be flame bait tho...
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Choe, Hyun-ho wrote:
> Thank you for your kind answer.
> It's very helpful.
> > PS: The official name is "Debian GNU/Hurd". As so many people speak
> > about "Debian/Hurd", I wonder where they did read that term, because a
> > web page using this term should be corrected.
> Sorry about the name. From now on, I use "Debian GNU/Hurd" instead.
> but I think it's not responsible to Debian site. They called "Debian
> GNU/Hurd" exactly in every their pages.
> It's something concerned about people's habit that they calls Linux
> distribution sets' name... RedHat Linux, Suse Linux, TurboLinux, etc.
> Maybe if someone is to blame about calling name incorrectly, it's mainly
> Linux-concerned companies, not Debian, I think.
> Thanks again.
> Choe, Hyun-ho
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org