[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Booting the Hurd ?



On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 05:16:22PM +0200, Yann Forget wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi, 
> 
>  Following the flame war on debian-devel about the Hurd, 
> I installed it to get an opinion by myself, as I don't have prior 
> experience about micro-kernels. 
> 
>  So, I managed to install it alright, ... but I can't boot it !!! 
> 
>  The statement by Linus 10 years back is still valid. What 
> the purpose to have a new design, a micro-kernel and 
> whatever if it is not even remotely useable ? Developpers 
> have managed to compile half of Debian packages, but 
> they did not even think to provide a way to boot it ! 

Assuming GNU is installed as you say, you just need the
proper GRUB commands in menu.lst (see the template in
/share/doc/grub/examples)

>  Installation of Grub is not even available from the CD. 

We've been unable to convince the bootdisk people to
switch to GRUB, any help on that is welcome of course :)

Also there's a new installer that uses GRUB, maybe it comes
with Debian 3.1:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2002/debian-boot-200202/msg00943.html

>  I have tried quite a lot of Linux distributions (probably 
> more than 30 different flavours, altogether), however 
> I didn't ever see anything as bad as this.

you could be disappointed because you haven't read Roland's
explanation:

"We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the
cutting edge of not being good for anything." (Roland McGrath) 

> And you say 
> that development of the Hurd started in the 80s ? 

Developement of GNU started in the 80s, developement
of the Hurd started in 1991.

cheers,

-- 
Robert Millan

"5 years from now everyone will be running
free GNU on their 200 MIPS, 64M SPARCstation-5"

              Andrew S. Tanenbaum, 30 Jan 1992


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: