[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: where do NEW packages go?



On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 04:53:15AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:27:48PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, and they really screw up the Hurd port, the last status mail I've
> > > > seen was "we are currently stalling and waiting for GCC 3.1 and the
> > > > acceptance of libc0.3 and dpkg." GCC 3.1 is already released, but we
> > > > are still waiting for the cabals. But I am wasting my time anyhow,
> > > > because Debian doesn't care about the Hurd port being screwed up.
> > >
> > > gcc 3.1 was released 2 days ago.  <plonk>
> >
> > You showed some arrogance already, but are thinking you know more
> > about Debian GNU/Hurd than I do? Or where does this "<plonk>" refer
> > to?
> 
> gcc 3.1 was released 2 *DAYS* ago.  You can *NOT* honestly expect for things
> that depend on gcc 3.1 to suddenly be allowed in, so soon after a new
> package(and a MAJOR one at that) is released.

I never requested it, read my mail more carefully.
 
> Your response prooves to everyone that you really are a moron.  And good at
> it.

Your response proves to everyone that a reading test should be part of
the NM process. I can't help it that you can't read.

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org  IRC ID: jeroen@openprojects
GNU supporter - http://www.gnu.org

Attachment: pgpc_cMV_mQzc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: