Re: where do NEW packages go?
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 06:39:34PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > > > Having /hurd has nothing to do with FHS. You can have FHS, as well as having
> > > > /hurd.
> > But what if the kernel makes use of it? Should the kernel be considered
> > software, for this definition?
> Was the Hurd considered when the standard was drawn up?
There's a more general chicken-and-egg problem too: the FHS isn't supposed
to be changed until there's some existing practice to change too; but
otoh it forbids people from introducing new top-level hierarchies to
establish existing practice...
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com