Re: where do NEW packages go?
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Having /hurd has nothing to do with FHS. You can have FHS, as well as having
> > > /hurd.
> > Software should never create or require special files or
> > subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> > hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package.
> But what if the kernel makes use of it? Should the kernel be considered
> software, for this definition?
Was the Hurd considered when the standard was drawn up?
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 025 267 9420
email@example.com - preferred. firstname.lastname@example.org
I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org