Re: where do NEW packages go?
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Non-existant? In Debian the power is in the hands of a small group of
> people who say in the public that they dislike transparency.
Huh? That's backwards from how things are. The group in power says nothing,
so you do not know who they are.
> Nice to know. But uhhh why are people still uploading packages into
> sid? Could somebody write a mail to debian-devel-announce telling them
> to stop? Or don't they have to stop? But why should we stop then?
Because they don't have to stop. New packages are the only thing requiring
attention(more so now with CIM).
> The Hurd is *different*. It's the Hurd, not Linux. Is it difficult to
> understand that "the Hurd != Linux" and the port "hurd-i386 != i386"?
> I can't believe that you don't see the difference.
My, how we twist the words.
Debian is Debian is Debian. If Debian is ported to Linux, then Linux must be
modified to fit the Debian OS. Same for the Debian port to hurd.
> I can read, I know what you write and what not.
> I've been willing to do that for about 5 months. I gave up.
And you couldn't have done it at a worse time. CIM, real freeze, release.
All have been going on. If you do not know that, then you really are living
in your own world, isolated from the rest of society by your own accord.
> Maybe if you start treating people as your equal instead of somebody
> who is 10 times more stupid than you, I'll try do that what you say.
Respect is earned. You do not earn respect by requesting changes. You earn
respect by showing you can get along with the status quo first.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org