Re: Woody release?

To: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>
Cc: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Woody release?
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:53:24 +0200
Message-id: <20010417235324.C397@ulysses.dhis.net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010417033524.28753A-100000@stephen>; from philipc@copyleft.co.nz on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:39:22AM +0000
References: <20010416200459.D4921@nisa.net> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010417033524.28753A-100000@stephen>

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:39:22AM +0000, Philip Charles wrote:
> Trying to coordinate too many archs.

The release cycle has been surprisingly consistent with all past releases I
experienced or heard of. It doesn't seem to depend on the number of released
architectures at all.

Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Woody release?
  - From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Re: Woody release?
  - From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: Woody release?
Next by Date: Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...
Previous by thread: Re: Woody release?
Next by thread: Re: Woody release?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread