Just as a quick heads-up. This took me somewhat by surprise -- I
didn't expect that this many people are interested in the Hurd effort.
Source: <URL:http://lists.debian.org/stats/> all data from someday
this month (presumably the first).
Architecture Mailing list Subscribers
powerpc debian-powerpc 527
sparc debian-sparc 520
alpha debian-alpha 450
m68k debian-68k 416
mips/mipsel debian-mips 225
arm debian-arm 194
hppa debian-hppa 147
s390 debian-s390 98
ia64 debian-ia64 67
sh debian-superh 34
Exotic "archs"
hurd-i386 debian-hurd 752
debian-beowulf 523
debian-bsd 259
Of course, ml subscriber numbers have no proven correlation to the
size of a ports userbase, developer involvement or, (godforbid)
relative merit of a port.
The above URL just *may* be a nice place to point a maintainer to who
consistently ignores hurd bugs in his packages.
--
Robbe (who wonders what the "win32" list is)
Attachment:
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature