Re: gawk
- To: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gawk
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 21:48:09 +0300
- Message-id: <20010401214809.B313@gaia.iki.fi>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20010331185601.B483@ulysses.dhis.net>; from Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de on Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:56:01PM +0200
- References: <20010331140638.A353@ulysses.dhis.net> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103311451530.4124-100000@home.unex.es> <20010331185601.B483@ulysses.dhis.net>
On 20010331T185601+0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 03:08:18PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Perhaps "colon": [...]/package/gawk/version/1colon3.0.6-1
> > Packages using epochs will always use them,
>
> No, they might have used this in older versions, before using epochs.
There is always an epoch. Epoch 0 is implied when an epoch is not specified.
You could thus list the epoch explicitly.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Reply to: