Re: hurd progress and bugs
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:27:42PM +0200, sk@theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de wrote:
> Tomasz Wegrzanowski schrieb folgendes am Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:33:14PM +0200:
> > People are not very sure if it would be better to keep Mach with some
> > changes (liku : modules support), take some better microkernel (is there any ?),
>
> Maybe L4 from the GMD or its free variant Fiasco, see http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/fiasco/.
I've been at this site, and it sounds interesting. This seems to be a
well-organized code, and mach seems not to be. But changing the
microkernel would mean rewriting a lot of source code, isn't it ?
Bye!
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Stefan Karrmann
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: