Re: GNU philosophy[was Re: Hurd on VMware ?]
That's why I don't agree with stallman, but that is all that I've heard
from him on the subject.
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 11:03:06PM -0600, Matthias Granberry wrote:
> > The problem is that it's not legally secured. It's a cover-your-ass
> > thing. And I think that stallman is a bit rabid on this, but don't kill
> > me for this...
>
> FSF Emacs is not legally secured either. Check all the mule-related files.
>
> Gnumach is not legally secured.
>
> Linux is not legally secured.
>
> Should I continue?
>
> OG.
>
>
>
Reply to: