[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Installation



On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Mark Kettenis wrote:
 
> Not really.  The reason why /libexec/rc is not found is probably the
> same reason why /bin/sh is not found.  You're sure they really are on
> the disk?  hd2s1 is hdc3 under Linux!
> 
	Both the files /libexec/rc and /bin/sh are present and /bin/sh is
a link to /bin/bash. Roland pointed out that the /bin/sh problem
could be related to the file /lib/ld.so, but this file is also
present. hd2s1 is hdc1, not hdc3 under Linux, If there are 2 HDD's,
and both are primary and secondary master respct. and a Atapi CDROM as
primary slave.

> The only thing that I can think of is the strange [PTBL] that's
> printed in thge partition check for hd2:
> 
>    %%% Partition check
>    %%%     hd0: hd0s1 hd0s2 hd0s4 < hd0s5 >
>    %%%     hd2: [PTBL] [523/255/63] hd2s1 hd2s4 < h2ds5 hd2s6 hd2s7 hd2s8 >
> 
	The [PTBL] means that the drive HDD uses an LBA mode of
addressing:
%%% hd0: ST32132A, 2015MB w/120kb Cache, CHS=1023/64/63
%%% hd1: CREATIVE CD1220E, ATAPI CDROM drive
%%% hd2: ST34321A, 4103MB w/128kb Cache, CHS=8894/15/63

The first HDD has 4096 cylinders, but in LBA they are reported as 1023
cylinders. Also my second HDD has 8894 cylinders, but under LBA they are
reported as 523 cylinders. Nothing fishy about that.


> (from your previous mail)
> 
> Probably an indication of a (nonstandard) partition scheme that's used
> on the disk.  That could very well be the reason why parts of your
> disk are inaccessable.  Unfortunately I have no idea how to fix this
> :-(.  Can you access this partition with Linux 2.0.36?
> 
	All parts of both the disks are accessible from Linux (Take any
version).

> Installing the Hurd on a partition on hd0 should work though!
> 
> Mark
> 

------------------
Ashutosh Rajekar
http://i.am/asr
------------------
I'm sorry my GMT time is really wild, but my sysadmin doesn't cooperate.


Reply to: