Re: Upcoming 2.1 Release Architectures
- To: Brian White <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Debian Developers <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Upcoming 2.1 Release Architectures
- From: Hartmut Koptein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 20:07:36 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19981014200736.A23764@et-inf.fho-emden.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19981014103429.A15061@mindcryme.com>; from Dan Jacobowitz on Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:34:29AM -0400
- References: <[🔎] 3624B217.C04DB5@verisim.com> <[🔎] 19981014103429.A15061@mindcryme.com>
> > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
> PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
> but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
> stabilized libc - or at least until we're a lot closer.
Right, powerpc shouldn't go in right now. We have more then 200 packages
uncompiled (many maintainer doesn't response for bug lists!!!).
We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
Brian and the other arch maintainer with 2.1 kernels: what about to
have the linux-cvs tree (as a debian package) in experimental?? This
will help. Linux-2.1.125 is very near on linux-2.2 !!
I like also to have the powerpc-debian-cd available before we release.
Hartmut Koptein EMail:
Friedrich-van-Senden-Str. 7 email@example.com
Tel.: +49-4941-10390 firstname.lastname@example.org