Re: Bug#1080956: SaunaFS

[Tony Travis <tony.travis@minke-informatics.co.uk>]

Hi, Andreas.

I've built and installed Debian 12 (bookworm) packages from:

  https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/saunafs

I only have Guest access to Salsa, but I've requested access to the 
SaunaFS repo on Salsa. I'm not clear if/how I can submit comments or 
bug-fixes - At present, I've just been sending git diff's to Urmas and 
he suggested that I use this ITP thread to get advice about what to do.

With help from Urmas, I now have a 4-node SaunaFS on my Proxmox 8.4 
production cluster running under Debian 12 (bookworm) as the host OS.

Please will you explain to me how I can best submit the changes I've 
made to build the packages under Debian 12?

Thanks,

  Tony.

On 04/09/2025 12:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Urmas,
>
> Am Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 12:46:03PM +0300 schrieb Urmas Rist:
> > > I noticed that the pristine-tar branch was lacking the latest version
> > > and pushed it (including a fix for d/watch).  From my point of view
> > > the package looks ready for sponsoring to new.  Should I upload as is?
> >
> > Sorry, I made the pristine-tar, but forgot to push it.
>
> No problem.
>
> > I don't think
> > there are any more changes right now I want to do.
>
> Fine.  I just uploaded to NEW. :-)
>
> > There is a release
> > candidate for 5.2.0, but I want to test it locally first and let it go
> > to stable before uploading it (usually there's a two week RC period).
>
> We upload this once the package in new might be accepted.
>
> > So, barring any more problems you or I find, I think you can upload it,
> > and let's see how it goes :)
>
> Crossing fingers that ftpmaster will find some spare cycles for it.
>
> Thank you for all your work
>     Andreas.