[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1080956: SaunaFS



Hi,

Am Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 08:33:15PM +0300 schrieb Urmas Rist:
> >   lrc
> 
> Interesting, this is very useful, thanks!

You are welcome.
 
> > which might be a helpful tool.  Lrc also said
> >
> >   GPL-3            | GPL-2+            utils/wireshark/plugins/epan/saunafs/CMakeLists.txt
> >
> > Seems this is some strange leftover - but you can be ensured ftpmaster
> > will stumble upon this.  So its better to drop this into d/copyright
> > or ask upstream to clarify the copyright.
> 
> Done.

:-)
 
> > Please also check the other hits while you can ignore aclocal.m4,
> > configure and install-sh
> 
> I think I've added most of what it reported. For some files it lacked
> copyright holder information, so I had to make a educated guess. On the
> BSD~Intel, I think that's correct, as it's a slight variant on the BSD
> license (saying Intel Corporation instead of above copyright holders),
> but I'm not an expert on the many licenses.

Lets see.
 
> > I think the remaining lintian issues are OK.  You might consider
> > adding a Forwarded field (either "Not needed" or just forward the
> > patches upstream).
> >
> 
> Also done now. Most of them are debian specific, so no need to forward
> them (though maybe the syslog could be fixed somewhat better upstream).
> Some are patches from the LizardFS package, which I've kept for now.

I noticed that the pristine-tar branch was lacking the latest version
and pushed it (including a fix for d/watch).  From my point of view
the package looks ready for sponsoring to new.  Should I upload as is?

Kind regards
   Andreas. 

-- 
https://fam-tille.de


Reply to: