Re: Bug#1080956: SaunaFS
- To: Urmas Rist <urmas@urist.ee>
- Cc: 1080956@bugs.debian.org, Urmas Rist <urmas@leil.io>, Tony Travis <tony.travis@minke-informatics.co.uk>, debian-hpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1080956: SaunaFS
- From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 18:09:43 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] aLXFR6jz8qC6aZps@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <DCE8OPHMI6UJ.20GWKR4HUFYQ5@urist.ee>
- References: <b48779f0-f646-4deb-a409-5a030d647dcb@minke-informatics.co.uk> <DB9P192MB15409174432FF8189DA094FBA64E2@DB9P192MB1540.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <172555933973.4179593.14696662343601783853.reportbug@urist-pc> <ZxpmUS1KQ_kJ27_g@an3as.eu> <172555933973.4179593.14696662343601783853.reportbug@urist-pc> <D56PN5N0HSS0.EJKAKTWGT0DA@urist.ee> <DC5NW8UYPEV3.2PQB4WYSYKPJU@urist.ee> <aKQK4U1dOfva30XW@an3as.eu> <DCE8OPHMI6UJ.20GWKR4HUFYQ5@urist.ee>
Hi,
Am Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 08:33:15PM +0300 schrieb Urmas Rist:
> > lrc
>
> Interesting, this is very useful, thanks!
You are welcome.
> > which might be a helpful tool. Lrc also said
> >
> > GPL-3 | GPL-2+ utils/wireshark/plugins/epan/saunafs/CMakeLists.txt
> >
> > Seems this is some strange leftover - but you can be ensured ftpmaster
> > will stumble upon this. So its better to drop this into d/copyright
> > or ask upstream to clarify the copyright.
>
> Done.
:-)
> > Please also check the other hits while you can ignore aclocal.m4,
> > configure and install-sh
>
> I think I've added most of what it reported. For some files it lacked
> copyright holder information, so I had to make a educated guess. On the
> BSD~Intel, I think that's correct, as it's a slight variant on the BSD
> license (saying Intel Corporation instead of above copyright holders),
> but I'm not an expert on the many licenses.
Lets see.
> > I think the remaining lintian issues are OK. You might consider
> > adding a Forwarded field (either "Not needed" or just forward the
> > patches upstream).
> >
>
> Also done now. Most of them are debian specific, so no need to forward
> them (though maybe the syslog could be fixed somewhat better upstream).
> Some are patches from the LizardFS package, which I've kept for now.
I noticed that the pristine-tar branch was lacking the latest version
and pushed it (including a fix for d/watch). From my point of view
the package looks ready for sponsoring to new. Should I upload as is?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Reply to: