[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1100343: marked as done (rdma-core breaks ibsim autopkgtest)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:50:24 +0000
with message-id <E1tvDTk-00CnqB-Cj@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1100343: fixed in rdma-core 56.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100343,
regarding rdma-core breaks ibsim autopkgtest
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1100343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: rdma-core, ibsim
Control: found -1 rdma-core/56.0-2
Control: found -1 ibsim/0.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of rdma-core the autopkgtest of ibsim fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of rdma-core from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form: 

                       pass            fail
rdma-core              from testing    56.0-2
ibsim                  from testing    0.10-2
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
Currently this regression is blocking the migration of rdma-core to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package? 

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rdma-core

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/i/ibsim/58721362/log.gz
34s ibwarn: [1221] parse_port_connection_data: cannot parse remote lid and connection type 34s ibwarn: [1221] parse_port_connection_data: cannot parse remote lid and connection type 34s ibwarn: [1221] parse_port_connection_data: cannot parse remote lid and connection type 34s ibwarn: [1221] parse_port_connection_data: cannot parse remote lid and connection type 
 34s parsing: /usr/share/doc/ibsim-utils/net-examples/net.1
 34s /usr/share/doc/ibsim-utils/net-examples/net.1: parsed 29 lines
 34s ########################
 34s Network simulator ready.
 34s MaxNetNodes    = 2048
 34s MaxNetSwitches = 256
 34s MaxNetPorts    = 13312
 34s MaxLinearCap   = 30720
 34s MaxMcastCap    = 1024
 35s ibwarn: [1224] sim_connect: attached as client 0 at node "Switch1"
35s ibwarn: [1224] get_smi_gsi_pair: Can't open SMI UMAD port (No such device) (:0) 
 35s ibwarn: [1224] mad_rpc_open_port2: can't open UMAD port ((null):0)
 35s ./libibnetdisc/ibnetdisc.c:799; can't open MAD port ((null):0)
 35s /usr/sbin/ibnetdiscover: iberror: failed: discover failed
35s 35s /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.knsa91jj/downtmp/wrapper.sh: Killing leaked background processes: 1221 35s PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 35s 1221 ? S 0:00 ibsim -s -n /usr/share/doc/ibsim-utils/net-examples/net.1 
 35s autopkgtest [13:07:17]: test discover

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: rdma-core
Source-Version: 56.0-3
Done: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdma-core, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1100343@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com> (supplier of updated rdma-core package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:33:51 +0100
Source: rdma-core
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 56.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>
Changed-By: Benjamin Drung <bdrung@ubuntu.com>
Closes: 1100343
Changes:
 rdma-core (56.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * libibumad: Fix iteration index for switches (Closes: #1100343)
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.2
Checksums-Sha1:
 8e289105227e83deefe28793ba75c2297f8f988f 3201 rdma-core_56.0-3.dsc
 189469248251a4bd2c305cf66f2c94b9bd02fc7b 33888 rdma-core_56.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 f4fdf59f20facaaddd970d073c5c82719c879671 9556 rdma-core_56.0-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 258ffaa512735e2150c20407e108f88b0127d125cfdd5d2aa5e48e918a9e23a5 3201 rdma-core_56.0-3.dsc
 152e59e5d0c7b7e1572029d63a9d0a9aaa4de9f37e0bac21a4cfc788364098d9 33888 rdma-core_56.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 ded27c3ac78663f886d79a6b307ac3179afc1235c90483172e7b4933756ab50b 9556 rdma-core_56.0-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 28afbb35240c9ebcda3cbd12cdc86acd 3201 net optional rdma-core_56.0-3.dsc
 78ac62ac65a7b679f000e5501cc455fc 33888 net optional rdma-core_56.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 1d83bdb8eff2d376e85f14d4dd10523d 9556 net optional rdma-core_56.0-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8hvk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpNSZTctrofr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: